Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2012

I recognize that this post is a departure from the subject of my blog; however, it is the best medium I have to present a message that is important to me. I hope you will indulge me, even though this may be the most controversial post I make.

Originally, I wanted to post a video relating to Memorial Day, but I soon discovered that I could not find anything that adequately said what was in my heart this weekend. So I am taking this opportunity to present my feelings about Memorial Day and what I believe should be our attitude toward it.

First of all, war should never be glorified. War is not about sentimental videos, stirring songs, or parades. Under the best of circumstances, war involves incredible horrors on which it is perhaps best not to dwell.

Nor should we idolize those who participate in war. Not all soldiers are heroes. Since they are drawn from our society, they reflect all the aspects of that society. Some serve out of truly noble intentions, while there are some (hopefully few) who actually enjoy the idea of combat. My experience is that the vast majority of soldiers are ordinary men and women who sometimes find themselves in extraordinary circumstances and respond as best they can.

We should also recognize that by the very nature of things soldiers are not allowed to question all the intricacies surrounding what they are ordered to do. While this may sound as if I am advocating moral relativism, nothing could be further from the truth. I hope you who know me understand that. Soldiers cannot be Monday morning quarterbacks. They do not have the luxury of evaluating every nuance of circumstances. To do so would result in disaster—for them and for our nation.

Most of all, I would ask that we all be careful about the judgments we make. If you have never been placed in a situation in which no action appears to be right, then please consider carefully before condemning those who are required to make those seemingly impossible choices, choices which may remain with them for the rest of their lives.

Finally, a personal note. I served in Vietnam from March 1969 to March 1970. My “welcome home” was in the Port Authority bus terminal @ 2:00 am, March 21, 1970. I was in uniform of course and waiting for a bus to take me to New Jersey. A hippie walked up and immediately began to tell me what he thought of me in language I could not repeat here. A New York policeman made him leave, but the impression was made. I was to discover that most companies would not sell me auto insurance because my service in the military made me “unreliable.”

Thankfully, our soldiers today are not being treated this way. For that I am thankful. I hope that we can save our criticisms for the politicians who make policy, not the military who are sworn to carry it out.

Most of all, in the midst of the barbeques and family reunions, let us pause for a moment to remember those who gave their lives. Sacrifice is worthy of being honored, and throughout the years America has had no shortage of men and women who have made that ultimate sacrifice.

And the best way to honor that sacrifice would be to work for a world in which there was no word for war. We do not live in that world, and it would be naïve to pretend we do. Given human nature, we probably never will live in that world. At the same time, we should strive for nothing less. I suspect every one of America’s fallen would agree with that goal.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Possible oldest Hebrew writingThe current issue of Biblical Archaeology Review describes what may be the oldest inscription in Hebrew ever discovered. That alone would make the find important, but it is the possible message contained in the inscription which is truly significant. The possibility exists that this inscription may be contemporary confirmation of the end of the period of the Judges and the establishment of the Kingdom of Israel.

So what is so significant about this inscription? Quite simply, it is what the possible translation tells us about the establishment of the monarchy in Israel. The Old Testament describes a period in which Israel was a very loose confederation of tribes ruled by people called “judges.” These were apparently charismatic leaders who emerged, especially during times of crisis. According to 1 Samuel, the prophet Samuel’s sons were corrupt. The resulting instability, along with the need for a more powerful government, able to defend Israel against her enemies, resulted in the desire for a king. Although at first resistant, Samuel is instructed by YHWH to agree to the monarchy, and Saul is chosen to be the first king.

The inscription is referred to as the Qeiyafa Ostracon. It is written on a piece of broken pottery, a common practice in a time when writing material was expensive and precious. It was discovered in 2008 at a site which has been tentatively identified as the Biblical city of Shaarayim (Joshua 15.36; 1 Samuel 17.52). Excavations at the site indicate that it dates from the early Israelite monarchy, and the absence of pig bones suggests that the site was an Israelite, rather than a Philistine or Canaanite fortress.

The same issue of Biblical Archaeology Review contains another article, describing four inscriptions which different scholars consider the oldest Hebrew writing, so we cannot be sure that this inscription is the oldest. It is, however, very ancient, dating to the traditional end of the period of the judges and the beginning of the Israelite monarchy.

As strange as it may appear, scholars apparently cannot be sure that the inscription is Hebrew. Hebrew script would not branch off from Phoenician script until the ninth century BC. We are dealing with a very ancient language that is difficult to pin down. One interesting characteristic is that the inscription is read from left to right, just as English. The Hebrew we know (like most Semitic languages) normally was written from right to left.

The inscription is obviously incomplete and certain of the letters are illegible, so any translation must be considered tentative. At the same time, what has been deciphered is intriguing about what it suggests. Here is the proposed translation given in the article.

“Do not oppress, and serve God …

despoiled him/her

The judge and the widow wept;

He had the power

over the resident alien and the child, he

eliminated them together

The men and the chiefs/officers have

established a king

He marked 60 [?] servants among the

comunities/habitations/generations”

Obviously this translation shows a lot of gaps and problems with the language, so there is much we cannot know about this inscription. But it includes several aspects that correspond to what is recorded in 1 Samuel.

  1.  It seems to describe a new king and was apparently written before the reign of David.
  2. The writing seems to refer to a transition from the judge (to which it refers) to a king.
  3. The message seems intended to be for a governor or tribal leader, explaining that the previous political situation has changed, a new king has been installed, and that the new laws and political reality are expected to be followed.
  4. The inscription also specifically refers to injustices under the judges, especially toward widows, children (perhaps orphans), and resident aliens.  It would appear the new king intended to address these situations specifically.

Obviously, there is more than one possible interpretation of the Qeiyafa Ostracon. But a legitimate case can be made that this is perhaps the earliest Hebrew writing we have and that it is a contemporary reference to the installation of Saul as the first king of Israel. Some Biblical scholars question the very existence of Saul and David, suggesting that they were mythological kings, created by later writers to glorify Israel’s beginnings. This small piece of pottery could provide contemporary evidence that Saul did actually exist and that the Biblical account of the beginning of the Israelite monarchy has some basis in history.

Read Full Post »

Chris Martin Writes

Sowing seeds for the Kingdom

ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ

"be strong in the grace that is ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ (in Christ Jesus)"

Daniel B. Wallace

Executive Director of CSNTM & Senior Professor of NT Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary

bridgesinindia

Musings from a distant land

The Aspirational Agnostic

Searching for a God who's playing hard to get.

According to Sam

What underlines how we say things cannot itself be said

Baraka

Sharing God's Blessings as Children of Abraham

Youthguyerik's Blog

Just another WordPress.com site

Faithful Aesthetics

Experiencing divinity through the arts

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: